Strategic planning helps PGCPS achieve organizational alignment, connects our stakeholders to a shared purpose and addresses areas for improvement; however, to implement a successful strategic plan, a process to effectively operationalize goals and strategies and take clear steps to monitor performance and success is required.
For this Equity Strategic Plan, Critical Success Indicators (CSIs) have been established to monitor progress toward achieving the outcome goals established in this plan. At the start of our Strategic Planning process, Hanover Research (Hanover), in partnership with PGCPS, completed an Equity KPI Benchmarking project. This benchmarking effort provided PGCPS with a preview of various types of indicators, insights and approaches to measuring equity-based strategic plans in similar school districts across the country.
This earlier benchmarking study was re-examined in the context of the new PGCPS Strategic Framework and informed the CSIs initially drafted by PGCPS as foundational indicators for this plan. Further leveraging Hanover’s experience with K-12 strategic planning and research of common and best practices for plan monitoring indicator selection, an expanded list of CSIs was developed and organized based on PGCPS’ Outcome Goals and Strategic Imperatives. Final CSIs were selected based on the following best practice criteria:
Source: Hanover Research
Each of the four outcome goals in the PGCPS Strategic Framework is comprised of multiple components – making the identification and selection of only a few measures to track progress comprehensively and accurately nearly impossible. In examining the complex combination of factors, through an equity lens that must be systemically addressed to achieve the desired outcome goals, the planning process yielded over 100 measures. In light of this vast number of discrete measures, a multi-layered or tiered approach to structuring and managing PGCPS CSIs is proposed. Tiered CSIs allow for progress monitoring at various levels of tracking granularity – ranging from high-level systemic indicators to detailed measures that address specific and targeted areas of improvement.
Chart A (page 20) presents an illustrative example of how the proposed CSI tiered structure will be implemented. Each outcome goal is defined in terms of the primary components of improvement. For each component, Tier 1 CSIs (high-level) are defined and are prioritized as key indicators of outcome-related success for the Goal over the course of this Strategic Plan. If appropriate, Tier 1 CSIs may expand into a series of lower-level measures. Tier 2 and Tier 3 level CSIs may measure a specific student population or be monitored and acted upon more frequently at milestone intervals to gauge interim progress toward the higher-level Tier 1 outcome-oriented indicators.
This structure forms a transparent and comprehensive progress monitoring system of indicators for this PGCPS five-year Equity Strategic Plan. This CSI structure will be developed and managed using a centralized system (e.g., a data dashboard) to house Year 1 baseline CSIs, targets and updates on a scheduled basis for ongoing monitoring toward targets. The tiered structure further enables users to explore and analyze progress indicators at various levels of detail that best meet their inquiry need.
Details of Tier 1 indicators and descriptions are presented here by Outcome Goal. The full list of CSIs (nested by Tiers 1, 2 and 3) are included in the Appendix. Annual and milestones targets for each CSI are under development by a collaborative team of performance management staff and data analysts.
CHART A: Example of CSI Tier Structure
OUTCOME GOAL |
COMPONENT |
TIER 1 CSI |
TIER 2 CSI |
TIER 3 CSI |
Educational Excellence |
Aligning Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment with Standards |
Equity-Based Curriculum Standards |
• Standards-Aligned Instruction • Standards-Aligned Assessments |
• Standards-Related Professional Learning Participation • Standards-Related Professional Learning Satisfaction • Subject Area Professional Learning Participation • Subject Area Professional Learning Satisfaction |
Improving Educational Outcomes |
• ELA Proficiency • Math Proficiency |
• Kindergarten Readiness • Attendance • On-Time Graduation |
– – |
|
Narrowing Achievement Gaps |
• ELA Proficiency Gaps • Math Proficiency Gaps |
• EL Progress • EL Reclassification • Student with Disabilities Progress |
• Supports for ELs • EL Related Professional Learning Participation • EL Related Professional Learning Satisfaction • EL Instructional Practices • Supports for Students with Disabilities • Supports for Struggling Students |
|
Increasing College and Career Readiness |
Postsecondary Preparedness |
• Career Readiness • College Readiness |
College Preparatory Coursework Participation |
Provide every PGCPS student with a premier education characterized by innovative, relevant, and accessible learning and development opportunities that build 21st century competencies.
Achievement of this outcome goal hinges on the district’s focus on four components, namely:
Tier 1 CSIs for outcome Goal 1 by each goal component are:
OUTCOME GOAL |
COMPONENT |
TIER 1 CSI |
DESCRIPTION |
Educational Excellence |
Aligning Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment with Standards |
Equity-Based Curriculum Standards |
Percentage of core curriculum that reflects Hammond’s Ready for Rigor Framework for Culturally Responsive Teaching |
Improving Educational Outcomes |
ELA Proficiency |
Percentage of students meeting (Level 4) or exceeding (Level 5) grade-level ELA proficiency standards |
|
Math Proficiency |
Percentage of students meeting (Level 4) or exceeding (Level 5) grade-level Mathematics proficiency standards |
||
Narrowing Achievement Gaps |
ELA Proficiency Gaps |
Differences in ELA proficiency rates across student groups based on gender, race/ethnicity, English learner status, disability status and socioeconomic status Student with Disabilities Progress |
|
Math Proficiency Gaps |
Differences in Mathematics proficiency rates across student groups based on gender, race/ethnicity, English learner status, disability status and socioeconomic status |
||
Increasing College and Career Readiness |
Postsecondary Preparedness |
Percentage of stakeholders agreeing that [their school/the district] prepares students for success in college or a career |
Our learning and work environments demonstrate an inclusive, authentic and culturally responsive community that attracts, supports, develops, retains and celebrates a diverse masterpiece of students, families and education professionals.
Achievement of this outcome goal hinges on the district’s focus on three components, namely:
Tier 1 CSIs for outcome Goal #2 by each goal component are:
OUTCOME GOAL |
COMPONENT |
TIER 1 CSI |
DESCRIPTION |
Excellence in Equity |
Creating Inclusive, Culturally Responsive Learning Environments |
Equitable Talented and Gifted Identification |
Percentage of students in a given group identified as Talented and Gifted compared with that group’s share of enrollment |
Equitable Advanced Course Enrollment |
Percentage of students in a given group enrolled in at least one advanced course (e.g., honors, AP, etc.) compared with that group’s share of enrollment |
||
Attendance |
Percentage of students in a given group who are chronically absent compared with that group’s share of enrollment |
||
Disciplinary Incidents |
Percentage of students in a given group with at least one disciplinary incident compared with that group’s share of enrollment |
||
Suspensions |
Percentage of students in a given group who receive at least one in-school or out-of- school suspension compared with that group’s share of enrollment |
||
Creating Inclusive, Culturally Responsive Work Environments |
Workforce Diversity |
Percentage of instructional staff from diverse backgrounds (e.g., based on gender, race/ ethnicity) compared with the percentage of diverse students
Percentage of non-instructional staff from diverse backgrounds (e.g., based on gender, race/ethnicity) compared with the percentage of diverse students |
|
Leadership Diversity |
Percentage of administrators from diverse backgrounds (e.g., based on gender, race/ ethnicity) compared with the percentage of diverse students
Number of internationally trained and Latinx administrators/APs deployed to schools in which English learners and newcomers account for at least 15 percent of enrollment |
||
Diverse Employee Retention |
Percentage of diverse employees retained (or percentage of diverse employees lost due to attrition) |
||
Creating Inclusive, Culturally Responsive Culture and Climate |
Equitable Climate |
PGCPS Equity Index (to be determined pending statistical analysis) |
|
Diverse Climate |
Percentage of stakeholders agreeing that [their school/their child’s school/district schools] support [students/family/staff] from diverse backgrounds |
||
Inclusive Climate |
Percentage of stakeholders agreeing that the district promotes cultural inclusivity by holding events and activities that celebrate diverse cultures and backgrounds |
Harness the power of organizational learning for improved creativity, enriched collaboration, systemic knowledge sharing and operational efficiency.
Achievement of this outcome goal hinges on the district’s focus on four components, namely:
Tier 1 CSIs for outcome Goal #3 by each goal component are:
OUTCOME GOAL |
COMPONENT |
TIER 1 CSI |
DESCRIPTION |
Workforce/ Operational Excellence |
Improving Operational Efficiency |
Facility Maintenance Efficiency (within 30 days) |
Percentage of maintenance requests completed within 30 days |
School Internet Access Equity |
Percentage of schools with sufficient Internet bandwidth (Five or fewer days that peak daily Internet usage reaches more than 75% of the standard available bandwidth for five minutes or longer) |
||
Technology Device Equity |
Percentage of students with PGCPS-issued personal computing devices aged two years or newer |
||
Realizing Operational Excellence |
Facility Maintenance Satisfaction |
Percentage of stakeholders agreeing that their school/building is well-maintained |
|
Learning Environment Satisfaction |
Percentage of stakeholders agreeing that their school has classroom environments that support student learning (e.g., size, temperature, lighting) |
||
Improving Creativity, Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing |
Workforce Collaboration |
Percentage of employees agreeing that [their school/the district] provides opportunities for them to collaborate with colleagues |
|
Workforce Innovation |
Percentage of employees agreeing that [their school/the district] encourages them to innovate
Number of ideas identified and implemented through Innovation Incubators |
||
Realizing Workforce Excellence |
Employee Retention |
Percentage of employees retained (Employees who did not leave the district due to retirement, resignation or termination) |
|
Employee Retention - Teachers |
Percentage of teachers retained (Teachers who did not leave the district due to retirement, resignation or termination) |
||
Workforce Development |
Percentage of employees who complete voluntary systemic professional learning opportunities
Percentage of employees satisfied with opportunities for professional growth and mobility |
Increase awareness of mental health and wellness linkages to learning by eliminating stigmas, increasing access to supports and decreasing the number of avoidable adverse educational outcomes.
Achievement of this outcome goal hinges on the district’s focus on four components, namely:
Tier 1 CSIs for outcome Goal #4 by each goal component are:
OUTCOME GOAL |
COMPONENT |
TIER 1 CSI |
DESCRIPTION |
Mental Health & Wellness |
Increasing Awareness of Mental Health and Wellness Linkages to Learning |
SEL-Informed Instructional Practices |
Percentage of instructional staff agreeing that they are confident in their ability to incorporate social-emotional learning strategies into classroom instruction |
Trauma-Informed Instructional Practices |
Percentage of instructional staff agreeing that they are confident in their ability to deliver trauma-informed instruction |
||
Eliminating Stigmas |
Attitudes about Mental Health and Wellness |
Percentage of stakeholders who report that the frequency by which stigmas are observed/experienced surrounding use of mental health supports at school/work is “rare” or “never” |
|
Increasing Access to Supports |
Usage (Student Supports) |
Percentage of students using supports for student mental health and wellness |
|
Usage (Employee Supports) |
Percentage of employees using supports for staff mental health and wellness |
||
Decreasing Adverse Outcomes |
Student Mental Health and Wellness |
Percentage of students who used one or more of the supports whose academic outcomes improved
Percentage of students who used one or more of the supports whose behavioral outcomes (e.g., attendance, disciplinary incidents, suspension) improved |
|
Employee Mental Health and Wellness |
Percentage of employees who used one or more of the supports agreeing that the support(s) improved their mental health and wellness (e.g., stress, coping skills) |
||
Safety |
Percentage of stakeholders agreeing that [they/their child] feels safe at school/work |
This five-year strategic plan serves as the primary roadmap toward transformation for PGCPS. Outcome goals defined in this plan will be realized by our execution of annual specific, measurable, attainable, relevant and time-bound (S.M.A.R.T.) goals aligned to the strategic imperatives. Individual schools and office performance plans are developed annually, which support transformational improvement via the prioritized strategies. Deliberate progress monitoring practices, led by the Division of Accountability, are in place at every school, office, department and division level. In addition, the CEO conducts quarterly progress reviews of key strategic goals to monitor progress at the systemic level.
Operational execution and management of the Strategic Plan implementation is grounded in the PGCPS Coherence Framework. The Coherence Framework is a model that depicts the interrelationships of various dimensions of the school system’s formula for transformation and serves as a blueprint for systems thinking, analysis, decision-making, prioritization and continuous improvement. By applying a performance management discipline toward transformative change, the school district is on course to realize its vision.
Having clear outcome goals, measurable critical success indicators, targets and agile strategies are essential to the success of this plan. In addition, focused implementation of the plan to realize transformation at every level of the organization requires a disciplined and cohesive approach to execution and progress monitoring. Annual goals, objectives, performance plans for every school and office, a disciplined process, accessible tools to measure and track progress, and an accountability system of monitoring are crucial elements for strategic implementation management.
Figure 4 illustrates the linkage and feedback loop of the key plans and reporting structures that guide, monitor and communicate our progress. This structured approach to planning, execution, progress monitoring and continuous improvement at every level of the organization provides a threefold benefit. First, it ensures that all students, regardless of their identify or their circumstances, have the opportunity to successfully matriculate in a culturally responsive and rigorous learning environment that leads every high school graduate to success in college, career, and/or their choice of life paths. Second, it empowers staff to be creative in their approach to demonstrating and achieving excellence. Third, it provides for a focused and cohesive approach to organizational learning and improvement that demonstrates sustained excellence, innovation and agility in an ever-changing environment.
FIGURE 4: PGCPS Planning & Monitoring Structure